# Difference between revisions of "Ricker wavelet"

Jump to navigation
Jump to search

(added stub content) |
(added image) |
||

Line 5: | Line 5: | ||

:<math>A = (1-2 \pi^2 f^2 t^2) e^{-\pi^2 f^2 t^2} </math> | :<math>A = (1-2 \pi^2 f^2 t^2) e^{-\pi^2 f^2 t^2} </math> | ||

+ | [[File:Ricker_wavelet.png|thumb|Example Ricker wavelet, as plotted by [http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=minimize+%281-2*pi%5E2*25%5E2*x%5E2%29*e%5E%28-1*pi%5E2*25%5E2*x%5E2%29+for+-0.033+%3C+x+%3C+0.033 WolframAlpha] ]] | ||

Sometimes the period (somewhat erroneously referred to occasionally as the wavelength) is given as 1/''f'', but since it has mixed frequencies, this is not quite correct, and for some wavelets is not even a good approximation. In fact, the Ricker wavelet has its sidelobe minima at | Sometimes the period (somewhat erroneously referred to occasionally as the wavelength) is given as 1/''f'', but since it has mixed frequencies, this is not quite correct, and for some wavelets is not even a good approximation. In fact, the Ricker wavelet has its sidelobe minima at | ||

## Revision as of 18:22, 29 June 2011

A model seismic wavelet.

The amplitude *A* of the Ricker wavelet with peak frequency *f* at time *t* is computed like so:

Sometimes the period (somewhat erroneously referred to occasionally as the wavelength) is given as 1/*f*, but since it has mixed frequencies, this is not quite correct, and for some wavelets is not even a good approximation. In fact, the Ricker wavelet has its sidelobe minima at

These minima have the value